首页> 外文OA文献 >Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Team Assisted Individualized (Tai) pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (Spldv) Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (Aq) Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri Se-kabupaten Karanganyar
【2h】

Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Team Assisted Individualized (Tai) pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (Spldv) Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (Aq) Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri Se-kabupaten Karanganyar

机译:从Karanganyar县SMP Negeri的逆境商(Aq)VIII级学生的物质变量线性方程系统(Spldv)的实验模型类型的拼图式合作学习和团队协助的个体化(Tai)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from students\u27 AQ. The learning models compared were Jigsaw cooperative learning, TAI cooperative learning, and direct learning. The type of this research was quasi-experimental research. Population was all of state Junior High School students in Karanganyar Regency on academic year 2015/2016. Samples for group experiment 1 (Jigsaw cooperative learning model) were 98 students, group experiment 2 (TAI cooperative learning model) were 99 students, and control class (direct learning model) were 98 students. The data were collected using documentary method, AQ questionnaire, and mathematics learning achievement test. Data analysis technique used two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusion of this research as follows: (1) The Jigsaw cooperative learning model makes better mathematics learning achievement than TAI cooperative learning model and direct learning model, while TAI cooperative learning model makes better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning, (2) Climber students get better mathematics learning achievement than students Camper students and Quitter students, while Camper students get better mathematics learning achievement than Quitter students, (3) for every learning model, Climber students get better mathematics learning achievement than Camper students and Quitter students, while Camper students get better mathematics learning achievement than Quitter students, (4) for every categories, Jigsaw cooperative learning model makes better mathematics learning achievement than TAI cooperative learning model and direct learning model, while TAI cooperative learning model makes better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning model.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定学习模型对学生的数学成就的影响。比较的学习模型是拼图合作学习,TAI合作学习和直接学习。这项研究的类型是准实验研究。人口为2015/2016学年Karanganyar摄政州的所有州立初中学生。小组实验1(拼图合作学习模型)的样本为98名学生,小组实验2(TAI合作学习模型)的样本为99名学生,控制班(直接学习模型)的样本为98名学生。使用文献记录法,AQ问卷和数学学习成绩测验收集数据。数据分析技术使用了不平衡单元格的方差的双向分析。研究结论如下:(1)拼图合作学习模型的数学学习成绩优于TAI合作学习模型和直接学习模型,而TAI合作学习模型的数学学习成绩优于直接学习,(2)登山学生数学学习成绩比Camper学生和Quitter学生要好,而Camper学生数学知识比Quitter学生要好;(3)在每种学习模式下,Climber学生的数学学习成绩要比Camper学生和Quitter学生要好,而Camper学生要比Camper学生和Quitter学生要好。与Quitter学生相比,数学学习成绩更好。(4)在每个类别中,拼图合作学习模型的学习成绩都比TAI合作学习模型和直接学习模型好,而TAI合作学习模型则比直接学习模型的学习成绩更好。 g模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号